Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 SO2D 105 - Mattier v. State

Mattier v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1980
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 177 So. 2d 1 - Strazzulla v. Hendrick · Johnson v. Cadillac Motor Car Co. · Thomas v. State · 300 So. 2d 732 - State v. Othen · State v. Padilla

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Public confidence in our criminal justice system is diminished and law enforcement agencies are justifiably discouraged when (as in Thomas v. State, Fla.App., 297 So.2d 850 ) the common sense application of the crime prevention and crime detection functions is strained through a filament of unrealistic exactitude. As noted in Adams v. State, Fla.App.1974, 295 So.2d 114 , 115 ‘“there is no war between the Constitution and common sense.” ’ ” (at 106)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.