Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 SO2D 120 - Abrams v. Jacobson

Abrams v. Jacobson’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1994
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 54 So. 2d 108 - Miami Shores Village v. Bessemer Properties · Pournelle v. Baxter · 49 So. 2d 535 - Barnett Nat. Bank of Jacksonville v. Murrey · In re Estate of Harby · Estate of Wood v. Chowning

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" 'The Petitioners disclaim any and all interest which they have under the Last Will and Testament instrument dated September 8, 1972.' ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We hold that the trial judge committed error in finding that a qualified renunciation is only one that contains certain magic words. It is clear from reading appellant's [sic] petition to revoke probate of the will and the amendment thereto that the renunciation was put in solely for the purpose of complying with the statute and that no further purpose was intended. Therefore, the renunciation must be considered as qualified, and appellants are entitled to take under the will.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.