Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 So. 2d 513 - Harding v. State

301 So. 2d 513 - Harding v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
4
states following
February 1994
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1994

7 state decisions

30197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. United States · Brown v. State · Taglavore v. United States · 245 So. 2d 225 - State v. Ashby · Robertson v. State of Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that there would be drugs in his possession. The deputy sheriffs learned that Hardison had two minor traffic arrest warrants outstanding and, without advising the local police, they went to Harding's home. They announced their purpose to arrest Hardison, gained entry to the house and arrested him; Harding then happened to enter the house carrying in”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “... were used as an excuse to scavenge for contraband and on such a predicate the plain sight seizure from Harding, the owner of the invaded home, was unreasonable, that is to say, fatally pretextual in violation of his rights under the Federal and State Constitutions relating to unreasonable searches and seizures. [ Id. at 514]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “without any pretense of necessity or without any suggestion of exigent circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.