Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 So. 2d 7 - State v. Barber

301 So. 2d 7 - State v. Barber’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

134
cited by 134 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 130 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 134 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Steinhorst v. State (1982), 852 So. 2d 226 - FB v. State (2003)

1 federal appellate · 130 state decisions

63019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Simpson · 166 So. 2d 892 - State v. Weeks · Yost v. State · 224 So. 2d 300 - State v. Wright · Mancini v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 134 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As we have previously stated ..., unless the issue of sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a verdict in a criminal case is first presented to the trial court by way of an appropriate motion, the issue is not reviewable on direct appeal from an adverse judgment. No such appropriate motion having been made in the trial court in this cause, the question of sufficiency of the evidence was not open to appellate review.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An appellate court must confine itself to a review of only those questions which were before the trial court and upon which a ruling adverse to the appealing party was made.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"The court may also in its discretion, if it deems the interests of justice to require, review any other things said or done in the cause which appear in the appeal record, including instructions to the jury.'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.