Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 So. 2d 892 - Nolan v. Liuzza

301 So. 2d 892 - Nolan v. Liuzza’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2018

15 state decisions

9019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sherwood v. American Ry. Express Co. · Reisz v. Kansas City Southern R. · Hoffman v. All Star Insurance Corp. · 200 So. 2d 693 - Desselle v. Wilson · Carkuff v. Geophysical Service, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““... The period of compensable loss of use is only ‘the time required by the exercise of proper diligence to secure its repair,’ (citations omitted) and, when damage is very extensive, the time needed to determine whether the car is economically repairable or should be replaced.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “However, as we interpret Sherwood ( Sherwood v. American Ry. Express Co., 158 La. 43 , 103 So. 436, 438 , (1925), and other cases, the plaintiff's burden is to show only that he himself exercised proper diligence in securing the repair.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “whether or not the owner of an automobile, temporarily deprived of its use while tort-caused damages are being repaired, may recover for that loss of use from the tortfeasor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.