¶1The appellant, Tom Goodman, was convicted of malfeasance in office, fined $100, and his office of constable automatically forfeited under KRS 61.170(1).
¶2We have considered each of the points raised by the appellant and conclude, after a discussion of them, that no substantial or prejudicial error was committed on the trial.
¶3The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.