Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 SW3D 276 - Anderson v. State

Anderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

34 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District)

Relationships

Relies on Taylor v. Illinois · Crane v. Kentucky · Marin v. State · Dewberry v. State · Mendez v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f a party makes an unsworn oral motion for a continuance and the trial judge denies it, the party forfeits the right to complain about the judge's ruling on appeal.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A criminal action may be continued on the written motion of the State or of the defendant, upon sufficient cause shown; which cause shall be fully set forth in the motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “All motions for continuance must be sworn to by a person having personal knowledge of the facts relied on for the continuance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.