Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 U.S. 459 - Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Harrison

Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis

301 U.S. 459 · 1937

Citation profile

182
cited by 182 later decisions
17
cited 17 times by the Supreme Court
23
states following
October 2008
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 7 district · 115 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 182 later decisions (17 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2008 · most notably McLaughlin v. Florida (1964), Trimble v. Gordon (1977)

7 federal appellate · 7 district · 115 state decisions — followed in 23 states

40019371940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Royster Guano Co v. Commonwealth of Virginia · Gulf Ry Co v. Ellis · Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank · Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. Coleman · Borden's Farm Products Co. v. Baldwin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 182 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It may be said generally that the equal protection clause means that the rights of all persons must rest upon the same rule under similar circumstances, and that it applies to the exercise of all the powers of the state which can affect the individual or his property * * *. * * * * * * "Discriminations are not to be supported by mere fanciful conjecture. They cannot stand as reasonable if they offend the plain standards of common sense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`That is to say, mere difference is not enough; the attempted classification "must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable and just relation to the act in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““the equal protection clause means that the rights of all persons must rest upon the same rule under similar circumstances ... and that it applies to the exercise of all the powers of the state which can affect the individual or his property, including the power of taxation....””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.