Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 U.S. 492 - Duke v. United States

Duke v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

301 U.S. 492 · 1937

Citation profile

102
cited by 102 later decisions
8
cited 8 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

53 federal appellate · 6 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 102 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2017 · most notably Russell v. United States (1962), Kordel v. United States (1948)

53 federal appellate · 6 district · 14 state decisions

280193719401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedHunter v. United States (from Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 243 · 18 U.S.C. § 541

Relies on Falconi v. United States · Hunter v. United States · Thorm v. United States · Thorm v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “for which no infamous punishment is prescribed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.