Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 U.S. 619 - Helvering v. Davis

Helvering v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

301 U.S. 619 · 1937

Citation profile

940
cited by 940 later decisions
96
cited 96 times by the Supreme Court
25
states following
June 2026
most recently cited

289 federal appellate · 106 district · 141 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 940 later decisions (96 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2026 · most notably Buckley v. Valeo (1976), Dandridge v. Williams (1970)

289 federal appellate · 106 district · 141 state decisions — followed in 25 states

26901937194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from First Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 801 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 802 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1004 (§ 804 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1007 (§ 807 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1011 (§ 811 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 901 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1303 (§ 1103 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 1 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. Blaisdell · United States v. Butler · Chas Steward Mach Co v. Davis · Edye v. Robertson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 940 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not confided to the courts. The discretion belongs to Congress, unless the choice is clearly wrong, a display of arbitrary power, not an exercise of judgment.”
    36 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “supra [ 301 U.S. 548 , 57 S.Ct. 883 , 81 L.Ed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.