Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

302 Conn. 463

28 A.3d 958

Docket No. 18414.

Feinberg v. Feinberg

Michael FEINBERG v. Joanne FEINBERG.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Argued September 8, 2011.

Decided October 11, 2011.

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 2011-10-11

Relies on DECHIO v. Raymark Industries, Inc. · State v. Andrews · 114 Conn. App. 589 - Feinberg v. Feinberg

Decided 2011-10-11

¶1Joanne Feinberg, pro se, the appellant (defendant).

¶2Michael Feinberg, pro se, the appellee (plaintiff).

¶3ROGERS, C.J., and NORCOTT, PALMER, ZARELLA and McLACHLAN, Js.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The defendant, Joanne Feinberg, appeals[1] from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the postdissolution order of the trial court granting the plaintiff, Michael Feinberg, physical custody of the parties' minor child. Feinberg v. Feinberg,114 Conn.App. 589, 597, 970 A.2d 776 (2009). After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

¶6The appeal is dismissed.

NOTES

¶7[1] We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the decision of the trial court ordering that the minor child should change schools and his place of primary residence?" Feinberg v. Feinberg,293 Conn. 901, 975 A.2d 1277 (2009).

/302/conn/463 · .json · Public domain