United States v. Certain Interests in Property Situate in Brooklyn’s Empirical Analysis
302 F.2d 201 · 1962
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2010
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. 53¼ Acres of Land · Bishop v. United States · 41 F. Supp. 809 - United States v. Certain Land in City of St. Louis, Mo. · O'Donnell v. United States · United States v. 6,576.27 Acres of Land
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“2. The fund deposited with the court is considered vested in defendant from the time it is deposited free of restriction. Bishop v. United States, 288 F.2d 525 (5 Cir. 1961); United States v. Acres of Land in the Borough of Brook lyn, 176 F.2d 255 , 258 (2 Cir. 1949); United States v. Certain Lands in the City of St. Louis, Mo., 41 F.Supp. 809 (E.D.Mo.1941), aff’d sub nom. O’Donnell v. United States, 131 F.2d 882 (8 Cir. 1942); United States v. 15.03 Acres of Land, etc., 253 F.2d 698 (2 Cir. 1958). Id. at n. 2.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Upon the filing said declaration of taking and of the deposit in the court, to the use of the persons entitled thereto, of the amount of the estimated compensation stated in said declaration, title to the said lands in fee simple absolute, * * * shall vest in the United States of America, * * * and the right to just compensation for the same shall vest in the persons entitled thereto; * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““We hold that the United States has a valid claim for rental value of the premises during this period [i. e., the period during which the condemnee remained in possession pursuant to court order], rather than an accounting of moneys received as agent, and reverse and remand for determination of such rental value.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.