Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 F.2d 374 - Riach v. Frank

Riach v. Frank’s Empirical Analysis

302 F.2d 374 · 1962

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
August 1982
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 1982

8 federal appellate ·

80196219701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 213 · 26 U.S.C. § 263 (Interest Equalization Tax Act)

Relies on Hollander v. Commissioner · Hayne v. Commissioner · Donnelly v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · 174 F. Supp. 748 - Berry v. Wiseman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “for the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, or for the purpose of affecting any structure or function of the body.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.