Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 F.2d 416 - Schoenberg v. Commissioner

Schoenberg v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
2
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

58 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently March 2008 · most notably Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Carl L. Danielson and Pauline S. Danielson, Commissioner Ofinternal Revenue v. Helen P. Sherman, Commissioner Ofinternal Revenue v. Estate of Jacob F. Schaffner, Deceased, Elizabeth Schaffner and Erwin Marsch, Executors, and Elizabeth Schaffner, Commissionerof Internal Revenue v. Hugh E. McLennan and Katherine McLennan (1967), General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co. (1973)

58 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

56019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Helvering v. Clifford · Mammoth Oil Co. v. United States · Helvering v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. · Sachs v. Commissioner · Elzig v. Gudwangen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We have serious doubt whether in a situation such as is presented here, where the witness was apparently equally available to both parties, any presumption should flow from the failure of either party to call such witness. Any rule creating a presumption from failure to produce a witness must be applied with caution.” There is nothing which indicates that [the witness] was not equally available as a witness to both the plaintiff and the defendants.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.