Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 F.2d 421 - Janzen v. Goos

Janzen v. Goos’s Empirical Analysis

302 F.2d 421 · 1962

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
3
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

43 federal appellate · 10 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably McSparran v. Weist (1968), United States v. The Montreal Trust Company, and Tillie v. Lechtzier, Executors of the Estateof Isidor J. Klein, Deceased (1966)

43 federal appellate · 10 district · 5 state decisions

290196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein D Stanton · Land US v. Dollar · Reid v. Covert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘To acquire a domicil of choice, the law requires the physical presence of a person at the place of the domicil claimed, coupled with the intention of making it his present home. When these two facts concur, the change in domicil is instantaneous. Intention to live permanently at the claimed domicil is not required. If a person capable of making his choice honestly regards a place as his present home, the motive prompting him is immaterial’ Spurgeon v. Mission State Bank [8. Cir.], 1945, 151 F.2d 702, 705-706 , cert. den. 327 U.S. 782 , 66 S.Ct. 682 , 90 L.Ed. 1009 .” Janzen v. Goos, supra, 302 F.2d at page 425 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.