Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

302 F.2d 442

Docket No. 17634.

Wellens v. Dillon

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1962-03-06

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1979

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““(h) The findings and decisions of the Secretary after a hearing shall be binding upon all individuals who were parties to such hearing. No findings of fact or decision of the Secretary shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or governmental agency except as herein provided”.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Kozlosky v. Gardner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1962-03-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Edward J. Wellens, San Francisco, Cal., appellant, in pro. per.

Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., Robert S. Marder, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and WALSH, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The Bureau of Old Age and Survivors Insurance of the Social Security Administration of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare determined that appellant was not entitled to old age insurance benefits for the years 1959 and 1960 because of the extent of his employment or self-employment during those years. 203(b) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.A. 403(b).

¶2

Appellant thereupon commenced proceedings for reconsideration and review of such determination pursuant to 205(b) of the Act, which proceedings are still penidng.

¶3

On March 16, 1961, notwithstanding the pending administrative proceedings, appellant petitioned the district court for a writ of mandamus compelling the secretary to pay him old age benefits. On motion of the appellee, the action was dismissed and this appeal followed.

¶4

Section 205(g) of the Act provides of direct judicial review of final decisions of the secretary made under 205(b). Section 205(h) provides in part:

¶5

'No findings of fact or decision of the Secretary shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or governmental agency except as herein provided.'

¶6

Since the statutory remedy is thus made exclusive, it was proper to dismiss the present proceedings.

¶7

Affirmed.

/302/f2d/442 · .json · Public domain