United States v. Page’s Empirical Analysis
302 F.2d 81 · 1962
Citation profile
193 federal appellate · 8 district · 25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 243 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably United States v. McConney (1984), Duncan v. State (1965)
193 federal appellate · 8 district · 25 state decisions — followed in 12 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Johnson v. Zerbst · Abel v. United States · Bram v. United States · Gouled v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 243 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Courts indulge every reasonable presumption against waiver' of fundamental constitutional rights.”
18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ 'A finding is “clearly erroneous” when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’ ””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Leavitt · State v. Cline““ . . . [I]t is the trial judge who hears the witnesses and who must pass on the credibility. We sometimes tend to forget that the testimony of a witness, presented to us in a cold record, may make an impression upon us directly contrary to that which we would have received had we seen and heard that witness.” Page, supra at 84.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.