Jasch v. Potter’s Empirical Analysis
302 F.3d 1092 · 2002
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Washington Association for Television and Children v. Federal Communications Commission · Vinieratos v. United States, Department of the Air Force ex rel. Aldridge · Wilson v. Peña · Sommatino v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is a practical and pragmatic doctrine that must be tailored to fit the peculiarities of the administrative system Congress has created. Exhaustion under Title VII ... is required in order to give federal agencies an opportunity to handle matters internally whenever possible and to ensure that the federal courts are burdened only when reasonably necessary. ... Congress never, however, wanted the exhaustion doctrine to become a massive procedural roadblock to access to the courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is 'to provide an opportunity to reach a voluntary settlement of an employment discrimination dispute.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the administrative process has not been obstructed. It has been exhausted,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brown v. Valoff
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.