Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 F.3d 279 - United States v. Cothran

United States v. Cothran’s Empirical Analysis

302 F.3d 279 · 2002

Citation profile

119
cited by 119 later decisions
3
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 119 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably United States v. Betancourt (2005), United States v. Lucas (2008)

38 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

560200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3563 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3664

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Brady v. United States · United States v. Cotton · Blackledge v. Allison · United States v. Broce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 119 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that the plural word `victims' and reference to `other computer and delivery companies' [in the plea agreement] make plain that this agreement goes beyond”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]here a fraudulent scheme is an element of the conviction, the court may award restitution for `actions pursuant to that scheme.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he bill of information is not our only source of information about the scope of the scheme.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.