Newby v. Enron Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
302 F.3d 295 · 2002
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2023 · most notably Renteria-Gonzalez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2002), 688 F. Supp. 2d 598 - Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. Cammarata (2010)
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77P (§ 16 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2283
Relies on Younger v. Harris · Dombrowski v. Pfister · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper · State v. Simpson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the parallel 'necessary in aid of jurisdiction' language is construed similarly in both the All Writs Act and the Anti-Injunction Act.” Newby v. Enron Corp., 302 F.3d 295, 301 (5th Cir.2002) (footnote omitted). 2 . See also Royal Ins. Co. of Am. v. Quinn-L Capital Corp., 960 F.2d 1286, 1299 (5th Cir.1992) (concluding”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Id. at 302 . Plaintiffs' counsel had obtained ex parte temporary restraining orders in state court that either duplicated relief already granted by the federal district court managing the consolidated Enron securities litigation, or, in one instance, obtained relief that the district court had denied. Id. at 303 . The Newby court found that the All Writs Act permitted the district court to enjoin plaintiffs' counsel from filing future state court actions without its permission. Id. Nonetheless, the Fifth Circuit observed in dicta that such injunctions could not be based”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The district court in this case was attempting to rein in a law firm that represents over 750 plaintiffs .... The problem is Fleming’s unjustified and du-plicative requests for ex parte temporary restraining orders, without notice to lawyers already across the counsel table from Fleming and engaged in the prosecution and defense of virtually identical claims in federal suits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Newby v. Enron Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.