Aparicio v. Blakeway’s Empirical Analysis
302 F.3d 437 · 2002
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 2020
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty · Heckler v. Ringer · Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family Physicians · Toilet Goods Association v. Wga Rdner · Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] person whose application for naturalization under this subchapter is denied.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Judicial review of naturalization denials is always available and is de novo, and is not limited to any administrative record but rather may be on facts established in and found by the district court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“because section 1421 provides an adequate review for their challenge”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.