Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 F.3d 448 - Mathis v. Exxon Corp.

Mathis v. Exxon Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

302 F.3d 448 · 2002

Citation profile

160
cited by 160 later decisions
8
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

58 federal appellate · 1 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 160 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably 863 So. 2d 31 - Mississippi Transp. Comm'n v. McLemore (2003), United States v. Fields (2007)

58 federal appellate · 1 district · 19 state decisions

830200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · General Electric Co. v. Joiner · Bourjaily v. United States · Salve Regina College v. Russell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 160 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[v]igorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof are the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[The UCC provision]- dealing with the situation where the price is to be fixed by one party rejects the uncommercial idea that an agreement that the seller may fix the price means that he may fix any price he may wish by the express qualification that the price so fixed must be fixed in good faith. Good faith includes observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing in the trade if the party is a merchant. (Section 2-103). But in the normal case a “posted price” or a future seller’s or buyer’s “given price,” “price in effect,” “market price,” or the like satisfies the good faith requirement.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “State law controls both the award of and the reasonableness of fees awarded where state law supplies the rule of decision.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.