Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 F.3d 552 - Herrmann Holdings Ltd. v. Lucent Technologies Inc.

Herrmann Holdings Ltd. v. Lucent Technologies Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

302 F.3d 552 · 2002

Citation profile

124
cited by 124 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 124 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Great Plains Trust Company v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co (2002), Dorsey v. Portfolio Equities, Inc. (2008)

46 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

620200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc. · Dussouy v. Gulf Coast Investment Corp. · Lovelace v. Software Spectrum Inc · United States Thompson v. Columbia/hca Healthcare Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 124 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e defer to intermediate state appellate court decisions, unless convinced by other persuasive data that the highest court of the state would decide otherwise.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]n deciding this case, we are required to make an Erie guess as to what the Texas Supreme Court would most likely decide.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Needless to say, we do not generally consider points raised for the first time at oral argument.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.