United States v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Terry v. Ohio , 392 U.S. at 30 , 88 S.Ct. 1885 , 20 L.Ed.2d 911 ; accord United States v. Sokolow (1989), 490 U.S. 1 , 7 , 109 S.Ct. 1581 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1 . *Page 7 {¶ 15} We evaluate the legitimacy of Terry stops by engaging in a two-part analysis of the reasonableness of the stop. First, we must determine”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. City of Strongsville v. Carr, 89666 (3-6-2008) · State v. Brassfield, Unpublished Decision (5-13-2004)

2. “investigative detention rather than a custodial arrest ... [o]nce the purposes of the initial traffic stop [were] completed, there is no doubt that the officer[s] [could] not further detain the vehicle or its occupants unless something that occurred during the traffic stop generated the necessary reasonable suspicion to justify a further detention.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Harris v. Klare

3. “[i]t is well established ... that an officer's actual motivation for making a traffic stop is irrelevant to the constitutionality of that stop”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. United States v. Garrido-Santana