Hardaway v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
302 F.3d 757 · 2002
Citation profile
74 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 117 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2024 · most notably United States Hampton v. Leibach (2003), Ward v. Sternes (2003)
74 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Williams v. Taylor · Gault · Miller v. Fenton · Fare v. Michael C.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 117 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“l[ies] well outside the boundaries of permissible differences of opinion.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Hardaway’s case is less egregious [than Haley’s], in that there were no efforts to keep his parents away or to confront him with false testimony, and he was held for less than one day rather than three. 13 There were also lengthy breaks in the interrogations, rather than the five grueling hours that Haley was forced to endure.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doody v. Schriro · Doody v. Ryan“Although we may not apply a per se rule, youth remains a critical factor for our consideration, and the younger the child the more carefully we will scrutinize police questioning tactics to determine if excessive coercion or intimidation or simple immaturity that would not affect an adult has tainted the juvenile’s confession.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.