Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 F.3d 857 - Dixon v. Lowery

Dixon v. Lowery’s Empirical Analysis

302 F.3d 857 · 2002

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
January 2021
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2021

6 federal appellate · 2 district ·

120200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · City of Canton v. Harris · Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati · Fuentes v. Shevin · Duncan v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a seizure carried out without judicial authorization is per se unreasonable unless it falls within a well-defined exception ....” Id. at 862-63. Rather, the officers defended their action by arguing Dixon's continuing property interest was insufficient to support a constitutional violation. Id. at 863. The court found that argument fell short. Id. at 864. Citing Judge Loken’s dissent in Audio Odyssey, the court reasoned,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Even if a claim to continued possession is in dispute, that possessory interest is still constitutionally protected.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “under conditional sales contracts that entitled them to possession and use of the chattels before transfer of title”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.