Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 F.3d 971 - Eunique v. Powell

Eunique v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis

302 F.3d 971 · 2002

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
September 2022
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2022

8 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

90200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Craig v. Boren · Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc. · Agostini v. Felton Chancellor Board of Education of the City of New York · Reno v. Flores

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unsupported children must often look to the public fisc ... for financial sustenance ... [was] the reason that the Child Support Enforcement Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 651 - 669, was enacted in the first place.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Unfortunately for her, Congress has decreed that her duties to her children must take precedence over her international travel plans. It has ordered her priorities for her.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “because it focuses the mind of a parent ... who wishes to travel internationally on a more important concern -- the need to support one's children first.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.