Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 F. Supp. 1383 - Koen v. Long

302 F. Supp. 1383 - Koen v. Long’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2013 · most notably Pulliam v. Allen (1984), Alliance to End Repression v. Rochford (1977)

13 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

260196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2283 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)

Relies on Pierson v. Ray · Douglas v. People of State of California · Dombrowski v. Pfister · Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co. · Massachusetts v. Mellon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court in Douglas v. City of Jeannette, supra, 319 U.S. at 164 , 63 S.Ct. at 881 had this to say: ‘It does not appear from the record that petitioners have been threatened with any injury other than incidental to every criminal proceeding brought lawfully and in good faith.’ “This language is applicable to the situation before the court. No person should be immune from prosecution in good faith for his alleged criminal acts. * * * ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ . . . The vague and indefinite description of the purported class depends upon the state of mind of a particular individual, rendering it difficult, if not impossible, to determine whether any given individual is within or without the alleged class. The members of a class must be capable of definite identification as being either in or out of it.” Chaffee v. Johnson, 229 F.Supp. 445, 448 (S.D.Miss.1964).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “belong to organizations which . . . (allegedly) are unpopular with defendants, and who . . . wish to continue participating . . . in activities which are controversial and unpopular with defendants . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.