302 F. Supp. 619 - Hicks v. Weaver’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2007 · most notably Cannon v. University of Chicago (1979), Shannon v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development (1970)
8 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Stern v. Board of Levee Commissioners · Local Union No. 12 v. National Labor Relations Board · Federal Trade Commission v. Mandel Bros. · Tileston v. Ullman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As noted above, HUD was not only aware of the situation in Bogalusa [Louisiana] but it effectively directed and controlled each and every step in the program. * * * HUD thus sanctioned the violation of plaintiffs' rights and was an active participant since it could have halted the discrimination at any step in the program. Consequently, its own discriminatory conduct in this respect is violative of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000d.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““[a]ny proposal to locate housing only in areas of racial concentration will be prima, facie unacceptable and will be returned to the Local Authority for further consideration.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.