Hampton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited
35 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Olano · Allen v. United States · Jones v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'affirmative showing that the error probably did affect the outcome below.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]his Court has equated the prejudice step of the plain error standard with the prejudice prong for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Willis v. State · State v. Newman“The Court of Appeals should correct a plain forfeited error affecting substantial rights if the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.