Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 Ga. App. 140 - Jamale v. State

302 Ga. App. 140 - Jamale v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Milam v. State · Pruitt v. State · 248 Ga. App. 456 - Hash v. State · 220 Ga. App. 474 - McClain v. State · 141 Ga. App. 529 - Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “another individual was the actual perpetrator of the armed robbery, mere presence at the scene will not establish that the defendant was a party to the crime. Proof that the defendant shares a common criminal intent with the actual perpetrator is necessary, and may be inferred from the defendant's conduct before, during, and after the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[e]very person concerned in the commission of a crime is a party thereto and may be charged with and convicted of commission of the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] person is concerned in the commission of a crime only if he ... [i]ntentionally aids or abets in the commission of the crime[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.