302 Ill. App. 3d 175 - Weiland v. Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1999
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1261 (Child Protection Act of 1966) · 21 U.S.C. § 301 (Animal Drug Amendments of 1968) · 21 U.S.C. § 360C (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360E (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360K (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)
Relies on Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. · Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr · Maryland v. Louisiana · Sutton v. United States · Distajo v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.