Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 N.C. 101 - State v. Jackson

State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
4
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

82 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably State v. Ahearn (1983), State v. Stokes (1987)

82 state decisions

4001981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Adams v. Williams · Harris v. United States · Davis v. Mississippi · Keeble v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “capacity to comprehend his position, to understand the nature of the proceedings against him, to conduct his defense in a rational manner and to cooperate with his counsel so that any available defense may be interposed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““In the nature of things, evidence of shoeprints has no legitimate or logical tendency to identify an accused as the perpetrator of a crime unless the attendant circumstances support this triple inference: (1) That the shoe-prints were found at or near the place of the crime; (2) that the shoeprints were made at the time of the crime; and (3) that the shoeprints correspond to shoes worn by the accused at the time of the crime____ Moreover, the bare opinion of a witness that a particular shoeprint is the track of a specified person is without probative force on the question of identification.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““The Fourth Amendment does not require a policeman who lacks the precise level of information necessary for probable cause to arrest to simply shrug his shoulders and allow a crime to occur or a criminal to escape. On the contrary, Terry recognizes that it may be the essence of good police work to adopt an intermediate response.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.