Fink v. Cole’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently August 2007 · most notably 57 Cal. 2d 228 - Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examiners (1962), Gair v. Peck (1959)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ala Schechter Poultry Corporation v. United States · Carter v. Carter Coal Co. · Matter of Small v. Moss · Rouse v. Thompson · Fox v. Mohawk & Hudson River Humane Society
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In our view the delegation by the Legislature of its licensing power to The Jockey Club, a private corporation, is such an abdication as to be patently an unconstitutional relinquishment of legislative power in violation of section 1 of article III of the Constitution of this State which provides: ‘The legislative power of this State shall be vested in the Senate and Assembly.’ See Fox v. Mohawk & Hudson Riv. Humane Soc., 25 App. Div. 26, 33, 48 N. Y. S. 625, 629, affirmed 165 N. Y. 517, 524, 528 , 59 N. E. 353, 356 , 51 L. R. A. 681; Carter v. Carter Coal Co., supra, 298 U. S. 238 , at page 311, 56 S. Ct. 855 , at page 872, 80 L. Ed. 1160 ; Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U. S. 495, 537 , 55 S. Ct. 837 , 79 L. Ed. 1570 ; Rouse v. Thompson, 228 Ill. 522, 536 , 81 N. E. 1109 ; State v. Crawford, 104 Kan. 141, 143 , 177 P. 360 , 2 A. L. R. 880; Baughn v. Correll & Riley, 311 Ky. 537 , 224 S. W. 2d 436 ; Wagner v. City of Milwaukee, 177 Wis. 410, 418 , 188 N. W. 487 .” 302 N. Y., at p. 225 , 97 N. E. 2d, at p. 876 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.