State v. Mayfield’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
48
cited by 48 later decisions
2
states following
August 2019
most recently cited
48 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“analyze the quantum of probative value of the evidence and consider the weight or strength of the evidence”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“fail[ed] to make a record which reflects an exercise of discretion.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.