Baker v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Disability attributable to a condition of the heart is compensable under Workmen’s Compensation Law, 85 O.S. 1951 , § 1 et seq., in this jurisdiction if it originated in an accidental personal injury sustained in the course of hazardous employment covered by the act.””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Charles Banfield Co. v. State Industrial Commission · Special Indemnity Fund v. Moore

2. ““In Nu-Way Laundry & Cleaners v. State Industrial Commission, supra, it is stated: “ ‘Where an award is sought to be vacated on the ground that the expert’s testimony was insufficient to establish a causal relation between a personal accidental injury and a subsequent disability, said award will not be vacated if the testimony of the expert witness establishes that the disability was the probable result of the injury.’ ””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Young v. Neely

3. ““As stated in Nu-Way Laundry & Cleaners v. State Industrial Commission, 194 Okl. 101 , 147 P.2d 795 , 796: “ ‘ * * * the problem before us is to determine whether the evidence as a whole, including the testimony of this medical expert, makes out a bare cause of possibility or goes beyond and makes the situation one of probability, that is probable causal connection, * * *”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Young v. Neely