Hopper v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2018
1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 84 Okla. Crim. 97 - Sadler v. State · 124 W. Va. 4 - State v. Friedman · 72 Okla. Crim. 1 - Murphy v. State · Harrold v. Territory of Oklahoma · People v. Hickok
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Conflicting evidence in a criminal case presents a question of fact for the jury. “ ‘Where the evidence is clear and convincing that the outraged person was not an accomplice, corroboration is not necessary to sustain a conviction of the crime of sodomy. “ ‘Where the evidence supports the jury’s finding that the victim in a sodomy case was not an accomplice of the defendant, such findings are binding on the Criminal Court of Appeals.’ ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Sier v. State · Hill v. State“[T]he principles of law applicable to rape apply to sodomy....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“has long recognized the analogy between sodomy and rape.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.