Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 P.2d 768 - May v. Archer

May v. Archer’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 1997
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 1997

7 state decisions

4019561960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cassidy v. Gould · Deruy v. Noah · Stallings v. White · First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Price

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The question of whether a claim is barred by laches must be determined by the facts and circumstances in each case, and according to right and justice. Laches in legal significance is not merely delay, but delay that works a disadvantage to another.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.