Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 Pa. 246 - Commonwealth v. Troup

Commonwealth v. Troup’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
2
states following
June 1986
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 1986 · most notably Commonwealth v. Samuel Jones (1946), Commonwealth v. Homeyer (1953)

42 state decisions

120193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Colandro · Commonwealth v. Nicely · Commonwealth v. Micuso · Commonwealth v. Green · Commonwealth v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Defendant attempted to set up an affirmative excuse, and the burden was therefore on him to establish it by the preponderance of the evidence, to be effective and justify a verdict exonerating him from responsibility. . . . Ordinarily, a defendant is entitled to an acquittal if an honest question of his guilt is engendered from any or all the evidence offered. . . . Such must arise out of evidence essential to the Commonwealth’s case, whether bearing on some isolated point or the whole of the evidence. . . . Where, however, the right to a verdict rests on defendant’s establishing by affirmative and satisfying proof some fact, it is not sufficient for him to merely raise a doubt as to its existence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.