Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 Pa. Super. 217 - Lattanze v. Silverstrini

302 Pa. Super. 217 - Lattanze v. Silverstrini’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

4 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2005 · most notably 332 Pa. Super. 284 - Colloi v. Philadelphia Electric Co. (1984), 455 Pa. Super. 384 - Riley v. Warren Manufacturing, Inc. (1997)

4 district · 21 state decisions

140198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hamil v. Bashline · Stevenson v. Economy Bank of Ambridge · Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co. · 252 Pa. Super. 203 - Albert v. Alter · 231 Pa. Super. 199 - Simmons v. Mullen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In an appeal from a directed verdict, the Appellate Court must consider the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the appellant. Lit-winko v. Gray, 267 Pa.Super. 541 , 407 A.2d 42 (1979). If a jury could have reasonably concluded on the basis of that evidence and those inferences that liability should rest with the appellee, then the decision to direct a verdict was in error. See Cox v. Equitable Gas Co., 227 Pa.Super. 153 , 324 A.2d 516 (1974). If there is any room for doubt, the trial court should not direct a verdict. Stephens v. Carrara, 265 Pa.Super. 102 , 401 A.2d 821 (1979).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.