Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 S.C. 243 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably State v. Kelley (1995), State v. Weston (1997)

45 state decisions

270199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Batson v. Kentucky · Wong Sun v. United States · United States v. Leon · Aguilar v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Rjeviewing courts will not defer to a warrant based on an affidavit that does not provide the magistrate with a substantial basis for determining the existence of probable cause. Sufficient information must be presented to the magistrate to allow that official to determine probable cause; his action cannot be a mere ratification of the bare conclusions of others.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he task of the issuing [judge] is simply to make a practical, common sense decision whether, [given all] the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the ‘veracity’ and ‘basis of knowledge’ of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “any information concerning the reliability of the informant, the inferences from the facts which lead to the complaint will be drawn not by a neutral and detached magistrate, as the Constitution requires, but instead, by a police officer engaged in the often competitive enterprise of ferreting out crime, or ... by an unidentified informant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.