Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 SO2D 136 - Chapman v. State

Chapman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
November 1986
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Barber v. Page · Hall v. State · LaFrance v. Bohlinger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The defendant, who was in custody at the time, was neither notified nor brought to the taking of the deposition as the rule unmistakably requires..." ..... "The use of a deposition, taken in the involuntary absence of a defendant, as evidence against him violates the defendant's right to be personally present during his trial and his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses. The presence of defendant's counsel, considering the unreasonably short notice he was given of the deposition taking, is insufficient to cure the error... ." Chapman v. State, supra, at 138.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The defendant, who was in custody at the time, was neither notified nor brought to the taking of the deposition as the rule unmistakably requires...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.