Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 SO2D 399 - Fontenot v. O'BRIEN

Fontenot v. O'BRIEN’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 1984
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Haspel v. Treece · 150 So. 2d 84 - Gierczic v. Gierczic · Gierczic v. Gierczic · 241 So. 2d 810 - Alexander v. Hancock Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2083 provides the types of judgments which are appealable, to-wit: ‘An appeal may be taken from a final judgment rendered in causes in which appeals are given by law whether rendered after hearing or by default, and from an interlocutory judgment which may cause irreparable injury.’ “The dismissal, ex proprio motu, of this attempted appeal from the interlocutory judgment herein is sanctioned by Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2162 as follows: ‘An appeal can be dismissed at any time by consent of all parties, or for lack of jurisdiction of the appellate court, or because there is no right to appeal, or if, under the rules of the appellate court, the appeal has been abandoned. * * * ”’ (Emphasis ours)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.