Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 SW2D 323 - Hagel v. Hendrix

Hagel v. Hendrix’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
5
states following
July 2000
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2000

8 state decisions

40195719601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 662

Relies on Arthur Appleyard v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Hyatt v. People ex rel. Corkran · Pierce v. Creecy · Hogan v. O'Neill · James Hyatt v. People of the State of New York Charles E Corkran

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The governor of this state may: ♦ * ⅜ * * * “(2) May surrender on demand by the governor of any other state any person found in this state who is charged in such other state with the crime of failing to provide for the support of an obligee in such other state. The provision for extradition of criminals not inconsistent herewith shall apply to any such demand although the person whose surrender is demanded was not in the demanding state at the time of the commission of the crime and although he has not fled therefrom. Neither the demand, the oath, nor any proceedings for extradition pursuant to this section need state or show that the person whose surrender is demanded has fled from justice, or at the time of the commission of the crime was in the demanding or the other state.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.