Taylor v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pen-Ken Gas & Oil Corp. v. Warfield Natural Gas Co. · Taylor v. Commonwealth · Kirby v. Jacobs · Hite v. Hite's ex'rs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Ordinarily, actual knowledge on the part of the complainant, of the alleged invasion of his rights of which he complains, is necessary in order to charge him with laches. However, knowledge may in some circumstances be imputed to him by reason of opportunity to acquire knowledge, or where it appears that he could have informed himself of the facts by the exercise of reasonable diligence, or where the circumstances were such as to put a man of ordinary prudence on inquiry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Osborn v. Griffin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.