Howard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Luleff v. State · Gehrke v. State · Edwards v. State · Crews v. State · Franklin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If counsel determines that no amended motion shall be filed, counsel shall file a statement setting out facts demonstrating what actions were taken to ensure that (1) all facts supporting the claims are asserted in the pro se motion and (2) all claims known to the movant are alleged in the pro se motion. The statement shall be presented to the movant prior to filing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chatman v. State“[I]f there is no record of any activity by the counsel on the movant's behalf,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chatman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.