Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 302 U.S. 233 - Phillips-Jones Corp. v. Parmley

Phillips-Jones Corp. v. Parmley’s Empirical Analysis

302 U.S. 233 · 1937

Citation profile

104
cited by 104 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
March 1993
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 6 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 104 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1993 · most notably Arrowsmith v. Commissioner (1952), Sattelberger v. Telep (1954)

36 federal appellate · 6 district · 16 state decisions

3601937194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedPhillips-Jones Corp. v. Parmley (from Third Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Phillips v. Commissioner · Phillips v. Commissioner · Pierce v. United States · Leighton v. United States · Hulburd v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The right to sue for contribution does not depend upon a prior determination that the defendants are liable. Whether they are liable is the matter to be decided in the suit. To recover a plaintiff must prove both that there was a common burden of debt and that he has, as between himself and the defendants, paid more than his fair share of the common^obligation. Every defendant may, of course, set up any defense personal to him.’ Phillips-Jones Corporation v. Parmley, 1937, 302 U.S. 233 , 58 S.Ct. 197 , 82 L.Ed. 221 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.