Haddad v. Border Express, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
303 F.2d 134 · 1962
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. F. W. Woolworth Co. · Costello v. United States · United Constructions Workers v. Haislip Baking Co. · Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. United States · Morrison v. Texas Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f a defendant-appellant claims, for example, that the evidence did not warrant a finding for the plaintiff, he must (a) print all of the evidence in the case on liability, or (b) obtain, and print, a stipulation from appellee that appellant’s appendix is adequate, or (c) file an agreed joint appendix with appel-lee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Chernack v. Radlo“deems it essential for the judges of the court to read.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Chernack v. Radlo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.