Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 303 F.2d 142 - R. P. Collins & Co. v. United States

R. P. Collins & Co. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

303 F.2d 142 · 1962

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
June 1989
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently June 1989 · most notably Warner Bros. v. Dae Rim Trading, Inc. (1989), Borge v. Commissioner (1968)

21 federal appellate · 1 district ·

260196219701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 122 · 26 U.S.C. § 129

Relies on Rodriguez v. New York · Walling US v. General Industries Co · Libson Shops, Inc., v. Koehler, District Director of Internal Revenue · Broady v. New York · American Pipe & Steel Corp. v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We find this argument unpersuasive because, on the facts of this case, it unrealistically attempts to segregate into isolated segments a course of conduct which is essentially unitary both in conception and in impact. Assuming, as taxpayer would have us do, that the court could conclude that the “overall” purpose of the acquisition was to avoid taxes, viz., to obtain the capital losses resulting from the sale of the plant and equipment, then we believe that it must have been within the fair contemplation of the taxpayer that certain operating losses would necessarily be incurred before this ultimate purpose could be effectuated and, to that extent, the operating losses would be included as a necessary incident of the “overall purpose.” In effect, once it is conceded that Priscilla was acquired with a view towards obtaining the tax advantages stemming from a corporate dismemberment, then we believe that all the losses which immediately precede this ultimate act are constituent elements of a course of conduct proscribed by Section 129. They are tarred by the same brush.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.