Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 303 F.2d 687 - Nat Holt and Blanche Holt, Husband and Wife v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Nat Holt and Blanche Holt, Husband and Wife v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
May 2010
most recently cited

38 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently May 2010 · most notably Commissioner v. Ferrer (1962), Luna v. Commissioner (1964)

38 federal appellate ·

360196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 117 · 26 U.S.C. § 7482

Relies on Helvering v. Horst · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. P G Lake · Hort v. Commissioner · Commissioner v. Gillette Motor Transport, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he essence of a capital transaction within the tax statutes and decided cases is that the sale or exchange of an asset results in a return of a capital investment coupled with realized gain or loss (as the case might be) which accrues to the investment over a certain period of time.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The nature of the right to receive future income as ordinary income does not change into capital gain by the mere receipt of a lump sum in lieu of such future payments.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “because 12 the term `capital asset' is to be construed narrowly in accordance with the purpose of Congress to afford capital-gains treatment only in situations typically involving the realization of appreciation in value accrued over a substantial period of time, and thus to ameliorate the hardship of taxation of the entire gain in one year. 13 Comm'r v. Gillette Motor Transport, Inc., 364 U.S. 130 , 134, 80 S.Ct. 1497, 4 L.Ed.2d 1617 (1960). 14 The Court has instructed that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.